The Definitive Guide to Living in the Capital , Cairo , Egypt

Film
The Woman in Black 2: Angel of Death

The Woman in Black 2: Cliched & Unnecessary Horror Sequel

  • Adrian RawlinsHelen McCrory...
  • Horror
  • Tom Harper
reviewed by
Marija Loncarevic
rate it
review it
The Woman in Black 2: Cliched & Unnecessary Horror Sequel

James Watkins’ 2012’s The Woman in Black –  led by one Daniel Radcliffe – was named one of the best British horror films of the past twenty years, so it comes as no surprise that a sequel, The Woman in Black 2 – a dreary follow-up which unfortunately fails to re-capture the mood and tone of the original – was quickly set to follow.

Directed by Tom Harper, The Woman in Black 2 is set forty-years after the events of its predecessor and plays out against the backdrop of WWII, as a number of orphaned children are evacuated to the countryside for safety.

Schoolteachers, Eve Parkins (Fox) and Jean Hogg (McCrory), are put in charge of helping to evacuate eight orphans out of the city and are tasked to take them to the abandoned Eel Marsh House, where they’re expected to set up camp until things back in the city settle down. Amongst the group of foundlings, is Edward (Pendergast); a young and a seemingly troubled boy who, after witnessing the death of his parents, has become temporarily mute and only communicates through notes and drawings. 

It doesn’t take long before Eve – someone who has taken a special liking to Edward – begins noticing that something is off and that the young boy is being troubled by an evil presence (a.k.a The Woman in Black).

Like so many horror sequels, The Woman in Black 2 is nothing but a futile and a poorly constructed cash-grab. While the misty aesthetics manage to add a bit of the creepiness to the overall proceedings, the story – which has already been assessed and probed from all angles in the original – doesn’t really know where to go, let alone sustain the interest of the audience who will almost certainly see the jump-scares coming from a mile away.

Taking every single horror cliché and failing to provide and infuse any real depth or meaning to the character’s individual arcs, the performance, as a result, were equally ineffective. The drama is non-existent and the frights are cheap and relatively short-lived, ultimately, branding the film completely redundant.

Like This? Try

The Woman in Black (2012), The Conjuring (2013), Insidious (2010)

360 Tip

This is the first sequel to be produced by the infamous Hammer Studios since 1974's Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell.

Write your review

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

recommended