Sign in using your account with
Crazy, Stupid, Love: Entertaining & Touching Romantic Comedy
Crazy, Stupid, Love recounts three intertwined love stories spanning three different generations. First you have forty-something Cal (Carell) and Emily (Moore). Emily is cheating on Cal with David (Bacon) and wants a divorce. A distraught Cal meets the much younger ladies’ man Jacob (Gosling), who teaches Cal his womanising ways and then falls for Hannah (Stone), the only woman who’s ever spurned his advances. The problem is that Hannah’s already dating fellow lawyer Richard (Groban) and is expecting a proposal soon. And to bring everything full circle, Cal’s teenage son Robbie (Bobo) is in love with his babysitter Jessica (Tipton), who is four years older and just happens to be in love with his dad.
The film centres on Cal’s identity crisis following his divorce. He loses his sense of self upon discovering his wife’s affair and her desire for a divorce. He soon takes up a near permanent residence at a bar where he drones on and on to everyone within earshot about how miserable he is. Jacob takes pity on this pathetic specimen and decides to help him regain his manhood, resulting in a pretty awesome shopping spree and makeover montage.
Bit by bit, Jacob teaches Cal his tricks of the trade. He tells Cal that by the time he’s through with him, Emily will regret the day she ever gave up on him. As Cal slowly turns into an older form of Jacob, he realizes that no other woman can replace Emily as his soul mate and vows to get her back.
This film is very clearly pro-commitment and pro-romance. Jacob’s constant flow of one-night stands is not making him happy, while Robbie is a firm believer in soul mates; to the point of obsessively pestering Jessica.
As in Little Miss Sunshine, Carell brings out the humour in the heartbreak. Whether he’s drinking his pain away in the bar or being bossed around by Jacob, he keeps things both light and tragic. Speaking of Jacob; Ryan Gosling looks like a model; only hotter. As Hannah so aptly puts it, he looks like he’s been photoshopped. Gosling and Stone play off of each other really well on screen with Gosling coming off as simultaneously oversexed and deprived of affection. Stone in particular does really well with the many awesome quips that she’s given and Marisa Tomei has a small but hysterical part as the first woman that Cal is able to pick up.
While the film is rather jumpy with abrupt switches from scene to scene, the cast and the dialogue more than make up for any flaws. For a film about divorce, it’s surprisingly funny and romantic.
Marking the fifth instalment in the Underworld franchise, Blood Wars rests in the hands of a first-time feature director, Anna Foerster who, although managing to create a few notable moments of action, fails to bring any ingenuity or freshness to its now exhausted vampires-versus-werewolves narrative.
The story begins with a brief recap of events from the last four films where we learn that everyone’s favourite vampire death dealer, Selena (once again fully embraced by the leather-clad, forever sulking Kate Beckinsale) has been betrayed and banished by her kind.
Still trying to cope with the pain of having given up her vampire-werewolf hybrid daughter Eve for everyone’s safety, Selena is surprised to be summoned back into the vampire community - now led by the scheming Semira (Pulver) - who wish to make use of her skills in order to train the new generation of fighters, while still escaping her own chasers and searching for her daughter.
Taking quite a bit of time to get going, Blood Wars – written by Cory Goodman – is filled with lots of politics and nonsensical dialogue between characters who seemingly have a hard time in conveying any emotion, thus, making it all that difficult for the viewer to get invested in what they have to say. Drenched in a seemingly cold, metallic-blue tint, Blood Wars – although certainly not heavy on the action front – does manage to offer a couple relatively exciting action set-pieces. However, considering that this is a vampires-verses-werewolves kind of a movie, there just isn’t enough of that that specific mythology to set it apart from any other action movies – no wooden stakes or silver bullets to see here folks, just plenty of swirling swords and guns that can’t hurt anyone.
Another problem here is that the mythology behind the franchise in general – something the keeps spinning around aimlessly with no real focus or ending in sight – is a little hard to take seriously.
All of the characters, including the PVC-wearing Kate Beckinsale, who thinks that scowling her way through the scenes will get her anywhere, are all without an ounce of charm or personality – which sadly, brings us to a conclusion that there is no fun to be had in this rather forgettable cinematic offering and generic continuation of a franchise which, perhaps, might be ready now to close its doors and call it a day.
What can you say about the seemingly unstoppable force that is Nicolas Cage that hasn’t been said before? A magnet for the most troubled, muddled and just generally exasperating films to hit cinemas in the last five years, his latest work in USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage does nothing to change his fortunes.
Despite being based on one a true story that has all the makings of a war epic, the Mario Van Peebles-directed USS Indianapolis bleeds all and any gravitas and emotion out of its incredibly dramatic source material.
The story goes as thus: the eponymous US Navy cruiser delivered the first parts of the atomic bomb that would go on to devastate Hiroshima, before being torpedoed by the Japanese navy, leaving some 300 of the 1000-plus crewmen dead and the rest stranded in shark-infested waters. Said sharks, along with dehydration and salt water poisoning, leave just over 300 survivors to be rescued.
At the centre of the ensuing hubbub is Cage’s Captain McVay, who many, very unreasonably, blame for the death of the 700 or so victims – so you see, it’s a very complex story, but one that very quickly descend into and exercise on how not to make a war film.
The occasional laughable CGI aside, Cage is oddly sedate, bordering on placid, in his role – yes, the central character is possibly the flattest element of the film, while seasoned actors, Tom Sizemore and Thomas Jane, are given little to chew on in their respective roles.
While starting exactly as one would expect a war film to, the wreckage part of the film turns into cheap disaster movie, before turning into a courtroom drama in the final act. It’s a muddle of a film that fails to really drum to the beat of McVay’s potentially brilliant arc as a firm commander that eventually buckles under the unjust pressure he receives back at home.
Bad CGI, a mammoth two hour-plus running time and Nic Cage can be forgiven, but what’s at the heart of this film’s mess is the script. Jumping from event to event, plotline to plotline, at a whim, with Cage’s soft murmured speech used to pave over the transitions, USS Indianapolis’s pacing is that of a film hurrying to stuff as many ideas and threads as possible – expect that’s not the case. Van Peebles tries so hard to build the layers of an epic, when, actually, all he needed to do was tell this simple but stirring story as it is.